by Jack Norris, RD
- Calcium and Vegan Diets: Why the Fuss?
- Animal Protein and Osteoporosis
- What Causes Osteoporosis?
- Calcium and Vitamin D
- Vitamin B12 and Bone Mineral Density
- Selenium and Bone Mineral Density
- Research on Vegans
- Calcium Absorption from Plant Foods
- Calcium Tips
- Safety of Calcium Supplements
Calcium and Vegan Diets: Why the Fuss?
The U.S. Recommended Dietary Allowance for calcium for adults is 1,000 to 1,200 mg per day depending on sex and age. The World Health Organization has similar recommendations (WHO, 2004). It’s practically impossible to meet these recommendations without large amounts of dairy, calcium-fortified foods, or supplements.
Enter vegan diets. Because vegans do not eat dairy products, their calcium intakes tend to be low. The Dietitian’s Guide to Vegetarian Diets (2004) lists 45 studies that have surveyed vegetarian calcium intakes in Appendix G. The daily calcium intakes in these studies are about:
- Vegans: 500-600 mg
- Lacto-ovo vegetarians: 800-900 mg
- Non-vegetarians: 1,000 mg
Only one study included supplements. In it, daily calcium intakes were: 840 mg (vegan males), 720 mg (non-vegetarian males), 710 mg (vegan females), and 855 mg (non-vegetarian females).
Animal Protein and Osteoporosis
As you can see above, the calcium intake of vegans tends to be quite a bit lower than lacto-ovo vegetarians, non-vegetarians, and the RDA. Traditionally, the vegan community has responded to this by saying osteoporosis is a disease of calcium loss from the bones, not a lack of calcium in the diet. This was based on two pieces of evidence.
The first piece is that ecological studies have shown that the countries with the highest intakes of dairy products (northern Europe and the USA) have higher rates of hip fractures than do Asian and African countries where much less milk is consumed. This can be explained by the second piece of evidence which is that studies show that after ingesting animal protein, people urinate large amounts of calcium. Therefore, the thinking goes, calcium intake isn’t important for preventing osteoporosis and vegans are protected due to the lack of animal protein in their diets.
Let’s examine this evidence.
While it’s true that Asian countries have lower rates of hip fractures than do higher dairy-consuming countries, it turns out that hip fracture rates can be misleading. The first prospective cohort study measuring clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures in an Asian population, the Hong Kong Osteoporosis Study, found that while hip fracture rates were lower in Hong Kong than Sweden, vertebral fracture rates were higher (Bow, 2012), as shown in the image below.
Bow et al. state:
The observed ethnic differences in fracture incidences may be due to the fact that hip fracture risk was affected by fall risk, whereas the risk of vertebral fracture mostly depends on bone strength. Despite the low hip fracture rate in our population, Hong Kong women had a higher prevalence of osteoporosis than US Caucasian women (35.8% vs. 20%, respectively) and a similar prevalence of about 6% in Hong Kong and US Caucasian men.
In other words, at least in this group of people from Hong Kong, the Chinese don’t have lower rates of osteoporosis.
Darling et al. (2009) conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 28 studies on protein and bone health including cross-sectional, prospective cohort, and intervention trials. Overall, there was very little evidence of a negative influence of protein intake on bone mineral density (BMD) with most cohort studies reporting either no influence or a positive influence. One study reported a significant increase in risk with increasing animal protein intake and increasing animal to vegetable protein ratio. Three studies found a decreased relative risk of hip fracture with increasing animal, total, and vegetable protein intakes. Two studies found no significant association of animal protein with fracture risk, whereas 2 studies found no association of total protein intake with fracture risk. The authors declared no conflict of interest.
Shams-White, et al. (2017) conducted a meta-analysis of 20 prospective observational studies and 16 randomized controlled trials and found no significant association between dietary protein and fracture risk. There was some evidence that more protein reduced bone loss of the lumbar spine among older adults. The study was supported by the Egg Nutrition Center and Dairy Management Inc. who were said not to have had any role in the design, analysis, interpretation, or presentation of the data or the results.
In a study from France (included in the meta-analysis by Shams-White et al.), Dargent-Molina, 2008 found that among women with calcium intakes lower than 400 mg/day, protein intake, which they suggested was mostly animal protein, increased the risk of fracture. In a study from Sweden, Michaëlsson 2014 et al. (2014) found that milk consumption was positively associated with early death in both men and women, as well as fractures, especially hip fractures, in women. While statistically significant, differences weren’t large enough to indicate dairy plays more than a small role in early death or fractures.
As mentioned above, there is a theory that protein increases osteoporosis by increasing a loss of calcium through the urine. The idea is that protein, especially through the sulfur-containing amino acids, increases the acid in the blood which, in turn, gets shuttled to the urine, increasing the renal acid load. In order to neutralize that acid, calcium is used as a buffer and then urinated out with the acid.
There has been an enormous amount of research on protein and bone health and this view of protein causing osteoporosis has been refuted. Here are some of the main points of a 2012 literature review (Calvez, 2012) of clinical trials on the subject:
- Many clinical trials show that adding purified proteins to the diet increases calcium excretion through the urine. But when whole foods are eaten, this effect is not strong. And phosphorus, in which meat and dairy are rich, counteracts the increase of calcium in the urine between 40 and 65%.
- High protein diets increase acid excretion in the urine, but this can be handled by the body’s acid buffer system without the need for calcium.
- In low-calcium, but not high-calcium diets, higher protein intakes probably increase calcium absorption from the digestive tract causing an increase in calcium excretion in the urine.
- Fruits and vegetables are beneficial to bone health, probably due to their high potassium and magnesium content. This could cause confounding in protein studies because diets high in protein are often low in fruits and vegetables.
- There is some evidence that a beneficial effect of protein on bones is only seen when calcium intake and vitamin D status is adequate.
- Maintenance of adequate bone strength and density with aging is dependent on adequate muscle mass which is dependent on adequate intake of protein.
- An increase in IGF-1 is most likely the mechanism for increased bone health with higher protein intakes.
Although HP [high protein] diets induce an increase in net acid and urinary calcium excretion, they do not seem to be linked to impaired calcium balance and no clinical data support the hypothesis of a detrimental effect of HP diet on bone health, except in the context of inadequate calcium supply.
Another 2009 meta-analysis found that among five well-designed studies measuring calcium balance, net acid excretion was not associated with either decreased calcium balance or a marker of bone deterioration (Fenton, 2009).
What Causes Osteoporosis?
If animal protein doesn’t cause osteoporosis, what does?
Genetics likely play a strong role in osteoporosis, and, possibly related, estrogen levels in women. Among factors that can be controlled by lifestyle and diet, there has been evidence for the following:
- Weight-bearing exercise throughout one’s lifetime
- Higher body weight
- Adequate intake of calcium, vitamin D, vitamin K, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, and boron
- High sodium and caffeine intake
- Too little protein
- Excessive vitamin A (retinol, not beta-carotene)
- Possibly vitamin B12 deficiency
Calcium and Vitamin D
Some background: When calcium levels in the blood drop, parathyroid hormone (PTH) is released. PTH causes calcium to be released from the bones, thus raising the low calcium levels in the blood. Osteoporosis may result from chronically high levels of PTH. The conversion of 25-hydroxyvitamin D to calcitriol is also somewhat regulated by PTH levels (Groff, 2000). Calcitriol increases absorption of calcium and phosphorus (another major component of bones) from the intestines and decreases their excretion in the urine. In so doing, calcium levels in the blood rise and PTH levels drop.
Research has shown that, on average, Americans are getting enough calcium. Bischoff-Ferrari, et al. (2007) conducted a meta-analysis of prospective studies and randomized controlled trials and found that calcium intake and calcium supplements were not associated with a lower risk for hip fractures. Bolland, et al. (2015) conducted a meta-analysis of 44 cohort studies and found that dietary calcium between about 800 to 1,000 mg per day isn’t associated with risk of fracture, and there’s no evidence that increasing dietary calcium within that range or higher prevents fractures. An exception is that calcium and vitamin D supplements have been found to help women aged 69 to 106 years old who normally have low calcium intake and poor vitamin D status.
Vitamin B12 and Bone Mineral Density
Taking vitamin B12 might also be important for bone mineral density.
Low vitamin B12 status can result in elevated homocysteine which might harm bones. A cross-sectional study from Slovakia compared lacto-ovo-vegetarian women to omnivores (Krivosikova, 2009). The vegetarians had lower B12 levels (246 vs. 302 pmol/l) and higher homocysteine levels (16.5 vs. 12.5 µmol/l). In the four bone locations examined, vegetarians had lower bone mineral density than omnivores in two locations, and their higher homocysteine levels were negatively associated with bone mineral density in three locations. The bone mineral density associations appeared not to be adjusted for body mass index which, while not statistically different between the vegetarians and omnivores (23.9 vs. 25.0, respectively), is an important factor impacting bone mineral density.
A cross-sectional study from Germany found that male vegans and lacto-ovo-vegetarians had similar markers of bone turnover to each other, but higher markers than male omnivores (Herrmann, 2009). The vegans had a rather high average methylmalonic acid level of 727 nmol/l, indicative of significant vitamin B12 deficiency. None of the participants were taking B12, calcium, or vitamin D supplements. Upon stratifying the subjects into two groups based on their B12 status, the group with poor B12 status had higher markers of bone turnover. However, since almost all the people in the poor B12 status group were vegan or vegetarian (62 out of 63), and few vegans or vegetarians were in the replete B12 group (6 out of 66), it’s not clear that the increased bone turnover markers were due to poor B12 status or some other factor common to vegans and vegetarians.
Selenium and Bone Mineral Density
In a prospective study from the U.K. of 1,144 post-menopausal women with normal thyroid function, higher selenium levels were associated with greater bone mineral density (Hoag, 2012). Although selenium metabolism is involved in thyroid function, the study found that the associations between selenium and bone mineral density were independent of thyroid function. After 6 years of follow-up, selenium levels were not associated with bone fractures. Because selenium intakes can be low in vegan diets in some countries, it’s important that vegans in those countries ensure an adequate source (see Selenium).
Research on Vegans
Bone Mineral Density
Ho-Pham, et al. (2009b) conducted a meta-analysis looking at the bone mineral density of vegetarians, concluding that “[T]here is a modest effect of vegetarian diets, particularly a vegan diet, on [bone mineral density], but the effect size is unlikely to result in a clinically important increase in fracture risk.”
A Denmark study found that vegans (n=78) had higher levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH) and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) than omnivores (n=78) (Hansen, 2018). Vegan PTH was within the normal range while BAP might have been slightly elevated for a small number of vegans. It’s not clear if these markers were of clinical significance.
A report from EPIC-Oxford (Tong, 2020) found a higher rate of bone fracture among vegans without any obvious explanation. Although vegans had a lower average calcium intake (591 mg/day compared to ~1,000 mg/day for other diet groups), there was little association between calcium intakes and a higher risk of fracture. See Bone Fractures among U.K. Vegans: Implications and Recommendations for more information.
A previous analysis from EPIC-Oxford (Appleby, 2007) found vegans to have a 30% higher fracture rate than meat-eaters (RR 1.30, CI 1.02-1.66) after adjusting for smoking, alcohol, body mass index, walking, cycling, vigorous exercise, other exercise, physical activity at work, marital status, parity and hormone replacement therapy. When the results were adjusted for calcium intake, the vegans no longer had a higher fracture rate. Among the subjects whose diets contained ≥525 mg of calcium a day (only 55% of the vegans compared to about 95% of the other diet groups), vegans had the same fracture rates as the other diet groups.
Adventist Health Study-2
Thorpe et al. (2021) published a report from the Adventist Health Study-2 comparing hip fracture rates of different diet groups among white participants only (due to their generally poorer bone health) who were 45 years or older.
Female vegans had a higher risk of hip fracture compared to non-vegetarians (HR 1.55, CI 1.06-2.26). These findings were adjusted for weight and height, but not for body mass index (BMI), so it’s hard to know if the difference is mainly due to the lower BMI of vegans which has been found in the Adventist Health Study-2 (see Cardiovascular Disease Markers of Vegans: 2013 Report from Adventist Health Study-2).
The findings were also adjusted for total calcium intake and total vitamin D intake, but not for protein intake. The table below shows the intakes of vegans and nonvegetarians.
After adjusting for calcium and vitamin D supplementation together, the researchers found that the vegans no longer had a higher risk of hip fracture. Their conclusion was that without supplementation of both vitamin D and calcium, female vegans are at high risk of hip fracture.
A previous report from Adventist Health Study-2 (AHS-2) examined caucasian Seventh-day Adventists living in the USA, comparing the intakes of many different foods and hip fracture risk after 5 years of follow-up (Lousuebsakul-Matthews, 2013). The study found that eating meat alternatives once a day or more (compared to less than once per week) was associated with a 66% reduced risk of hip fracture in the vegetarians (0.34, 0.12-0.95). Eating legumes once per day or more (compared to less than once per week) was associated with a 55% reduced risk in vegetarians (0.45, 0.22-0.94).
Buddhist Nuns (Vietnam, 2011)
Ho-Pham et al. (2011) studied 88 vegans and 93 omnivores. After two years of follow-up, 5 vegans and 5 omnivores had sustained a new vertebral fracture; there was no significant difference between the two groups.
Food questionnaires indicated that the vegans were only eating an average of 1,093 calories, 36 g of protein, and 360 mg of calcium per day. The estimated energy requirement for women their age and size is about 1,600 calories indicating possible underestimation. The non-vegan nuns had intakes of 1,429 calories, 62 g of protein, and 590 mg of calcium per day which seems more plausible.
Ten fractures in 181 women in two years is high. The rate of vertebral fracture in women over 65 in Hong Kong and Japan is 594/100,000 person-years (Ho-Pham, 2009a). The fracture rate in this Buddhist nun study works out to be 2,762/100,000 person-years. The fractures in the Buddhist nun study were determined by x-raying each subject, rather than reporting a bone break, and would likely find more fractures than the study determining the 594/100,000 rate.
In summary, compared to non-vegetarian Buddhist nuns, vegan nuns had a similar rate of vertebral fractures, but it appears that the rates for both groups were high.
Calcium Absorption from Plant Foods
For calcium amounts and absorption rates of various plant foods, please see the table Calcium and Oxalate Content of Foods. Most of the calcium amounts in that table come from the USDA nutrient database, which lists an average of the samples they’ve analyzed. The amount of calcium in plant foods is somewhat dependent on the amount of calcium in the soil (Weaver, 2013).
The DRI for calcium is roughly based on an average absorption of calcium from foods of 25% (p. 38 in reference DRI Dietary Reference Intakes, 2011). This means adults should aim to absorb about 250 mg of calcium per day.
As a calcium dose increases, the percentage absorbed decreases. Beyond the size of the dose of calcium, the oxalate level in plant foods is the main determinant of how much calcium can be absorbed.
See Calcium and Oxalate Content of Foods for how much calcium is absorbed from various plant foods, along with references and details for this summary of calcium in plant foods:
- Studies have shown that calcium in fortified soymilk, bok choy, kale, and mustard greens is absorbed well.
- Based on oxalate levels, the calcium in turnip greens, watercress, and broccoli should also be absorbed well.
- Based on oxalate levels, the calcium in collards should be absorbed moderately well.
- Studies have shown that the calcium in spinach and rhubarb is not absorbed well.
- Based on oxalate levels, the calcium in beet greens and swiss chard should not be absorbed well.
- Many non-dairy milks are now fortified with calcium, vitamin D, and/or vitamin B12. Many orange juices are fortified with calcium.
- Fortified beverages should be well-shaken to make sure the calcium has not settled to the bottom of the carton.
- Calcium supplements can inhibit iron absorption if eaten at the same time (Groff, 2000).
- The Daily Value for calcium on food labels is 1,000 mg. Therefore, if a food label says it has 25% of the daily value, it means it has 250 mg of calcium per serving.
Safety of Calcium Supplements
Some research has linked calcium supplements with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. These studies have mostly found a link in people getting well over the DRI for calcium (more info) with the effect stronger in smokers.
A 2013 study from Sweden found that there was no increased risk of up to 1,300 mg of calcium per day, but a significantly increased risk ≥1,400 mg per day (Michaëlsson, 2013).
Another study looking at calcification of the arteries found a cross-sectional correlation at baseline, but no prospective association (Wang, 2010).
The Framingham Study measured calcium intakes and followed participants for four years at which time they measured the amount of calcification of their arteries (Samelson, 2012). They found no correlation or trends with calcium intake and calcification of the arteries in amounts up to about 3,000 mg per day in either men or women or for calcium supplements of 500 mg per day or more compared to no supplements or up to 500 mg per day. See also No Need to Worry About Calcium and Your Heart from the Tufts Health & Nutrition Letter (November, 2019).
To be safe, it might be best not to increase calcium intake above 1,400 mg per day. People with chronic kidney disease should talk to their physicians about the pros and cons of calcium supplements.
Colorectal cancer is another concern with regard to calcium supplements. As described in Calcium Supplements and Colorectal Cancer, one study found that long-term use of a 1,200 mg per day calcium supplement was associated with an increased risk of one type of polyp that can lead to colorectal cancer. This increased risk with higher calcium intakes was not seen in other studies although the other studies didn’t look at total calcium intake rather than supplements specifically. The authors of this study suggest that those with serrated polyps of the colon or rectum, especially women and smokers, avoid calcium supplements (Crockett 2018).
There’s been concern that taking calcium supplements can increase the risk of kidney stones, but for the most part, research has shown that taking calcium supplements with meals can actually reduce the risk of calcium-oxalate kidney stones, the most common form of stone. For more information, see the article Oxalate.
Conclusion on Calcium and Vegan Diets
There is no reason to think that vegans are protected from osteoporosis more than other diet groups, and they should strive to meet calcium recommendations. Although it’s possible to meet calcium recommendations by eating greens alone (see chart), the average vegan probably won’t meet recommendations without drinking a glass of fortified drink each day, eating calcium-set tofu, or taking a 250-300 mg supplement (in addition to eating an otherwise balanced diet). Although it’s important to get enough calcium, don’t ingest more than 1,400 mg of calcium per day without the supervision of a health professional.
Last updated: February 2021
Barr SI, Prior JC, Janelle KC, Lentle BC. Spinal bone mineral density in premenopausal vegetarian and nonvegetarian women: cross-sectional and prospective comparisons. J Am Diet Assoc 1998 Jul;98(7):760-5.
Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Dawson-Hughes B, Baron JA, Burckhardt P, Li R, Spiegelman D, Specker B, Orav JE, Wong JB, Staehelin HB, O’Reilly E, Kiel DP, and Willett WC. Calcium intake and hip fracture risk in men and women: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials. Am J of Clin Nutr. 2007 Dec;86( 6): 1780-1790.
Bow CH, Cheung E, Cheung CL, Xiao SM, Loong C, Soong C, Tan KC, Luckey MM, Cauley JA, Fujiwara S, Kung AW. Ethnic difference of clinical vertebral fracture risk. Osteoporos Int. 2012 Mar;23(3):879-85.
Dargent-Molina P, Sabia S, Touvier M, Kesse E, Bréart G, Clavel-Chapelon F, Boutron-Ruault MC. Proteins, dietary acid load, and calcium and risk of postmenopausal fractures in the E3N French women prospective study. J Bone Miner Res. 2008 Dec;23(12):1915-22.
DRI Dietary Reference Intakes Calcium Vitamin D. Committee to Review Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin D and Calcium. Food and Nutrition Board. A. Catharine Ross, Christine L. Taylor, Ann L. Yaktine, and Heather B. Del Valle, Editors. Institute Of Medicine of The National Academies. The National Academies Press. Washington, D.C. 2011.
Ho-Pham 2009a. Ho-Pham LT, Nguyen PL, Le TT, Doan TA, Tran NT, Le TA, Nguyen TV. Veganism, bone mineral density, and body composition: a study in Buddhist nuns. Osteoporos Int. 2009 Apr 7. (Epub ahead of print)
Ho-Pham LT, Vu BQ, Lai TQ, Nguyen ND, Nguyen TV. Vegetarianism, bone loss, fracture and vitamin D: a longitudinal study in Asian vegans and non-vegans. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011 Aug 3. (Epub ahead of print)
Hoeg A, Gogakos A, Murphy E, Mueller S, Köhrle J, Reid DM, Glüer CC, Felsenberg D, Roux C, Eastell R, Schomburg L, Williams GR. Bone turnover and bone mineral density are independently related to selenium status in healthy euthyroid postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Nov;97(11):4061-70.
Iguacel I, Miguel-Berges ML, Gómez-Bruton A, Moreno LA, Julián C.Veganism, vegetarianism, bone mineral density, and fracture risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Nutr Rev. 2019 Jan 1;77(1):1-18. Not cited.
Key TJ, Appleby PN, Spencer EA, Roddam AW, Neale RE, Allen NE. Calcium, diet and fracture risk: a prospective study of 1898 incident fractures among 34 696 British women and men. Public Health Nutr. 2007 Nov;10(11):1314-20.
Krivosikova Z, Krajcovicova-Kudlackova M, Spustova V, Stefikova K, Valachovicova M, Blazicek P, Nemcova T. The association between high plasma homocysteine levels and lower bone mineral density in Slovak women: the impact of vegetarian diet. Eur J Nutr. 2009 Oct 7.
Lousuebsakul-Matthews V, Thorpe DL, Knutsen R, Beeson WL, Fraser GE, Knutsen SF. Legumes and meat analogues consumption are associated with hip fracture risk independently of meat intake among Caucasian men and women: the Adventist Health Study-2. Public Health Nutr. 2013 Oct 8:1-11. (Epub ahead of print)
Michaëlsson K, Melhus H, Warensjö Lemming E, Wolk A, Byberg L. Long term calcium intake and rates of all cause and cardiovascular mortality: community based prospective longitudinal cohort study. BMJ. 2013 Feb 12;346:f228.
Parsons TJ, van Dusseldorp M, van der Vliet M, van de Werken K, Schaafsma G, van Staveren WA. Reduced bone mass in Dutch adolescents fed a macrobiotic diet in early life. J Bone Miner Res 1997 Sep;12(9):1486-94.
Samelson EJ, Booth SL, Fox CS, Tucker KL, Wang TJ, Hoffmann U, Cupples LA, O’Donnell CJ, Kiel DP. Calcium intake is not associated with increased coronary artery calcification: the Framingham Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Dec;96(6):1274-80.
Shams-White MM, Chung M, Du M, Fu Z, et al. Dietary protein and bone health: a systematic review and meta-analysis from the National Osteoporosis Foundation. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Jun;105(6):1528-1543.
Thorpe DL, Beeson WL, Knutsen R, Fraser GE, Knutsen SF. Dietary patterns and hip fracture in the Adventist Health Study 2: combined vitamin D and calcium supplementation mitigate increased hip fracture risk among vegans. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 May 8:nqab095.
Tong TYN, Appleby PN, Armstrong MEG, Fensom GK, Knuppel A, Papier K, Perez-Cornago A, Travis RC, Key TJ. Vegetarian and vegan diets and risks of total and site-specific fractures: results from the prospective EPIC-Oxford study. BMC Med. 2020 Nov 23;18(1):353.
Wang TK, Bolland MJ, van Pelt NC, Horne AM, Mason BH, Ames RW, Grey AB, Ruygrok PN, Gamble GD, Reid IR. Relationships between vascular calcification, calcium metabolism, bone density, and fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2010 Dec;25(12):2777-85. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.183. Epub 2010 Jul 16. Erratum in: J Bone Miner Res. 2011 Feb;26(2):439. (Abstract)
World Health Organization. Vitamin and mineral requirements in human nutrition: report of a joint FAO/WHO expert consultation, Bangkok, Thailand, 21–30 September 1998. Copyright 2004. p. 71, Table 4.2.